Girl with a Pearl Earring.

This painting is created by Johannes Vermeer (1632-1675). The painting is also called "The Dutch Mona Lisa". The official tale about this painting goes like this. The model who sits in front of Vermeer was the maid of the Vermeer family. And the master himself fell in love with that girl, but his wife forced that maid to flee away because that kind of relationship is not acceptable. The story mentions that Vermeer gave that earring to that girl as a gift. And of course, that beautiful and sad story gave an innovation for the movie's plays. But the fact is that story is a myth. 

But the fact is that in the most modern theories that girl didn't even have that famous earring. When we are taking a closer look at the earring. We might see that is not even the pearl. It looks like a metal ball or maybe a droplet of mercury. And then we might look at the blue bandana that the girl wears. The blue color might mean that the thoughts of that girl are from heaven because the blue color means heaven. 

When we are looking at religious paintings. And one of them is pictured in Valamo Monastery in Finland (The Second image), we see a holy person wearing a blue toga. There is an interesting detail in that painting that was photographed in Valamo. In the place of the tree is the ghost-looking area there could be the figure that somebody tried to vanish. There could be larger Mary, the mother of Jesus creature. But that creature is wiped away for some unknown reason. The shape of that thing remains in that painting.

The blue color could mean that the person hides his identity. So the blue bandana could mean that the girl is very intelligent. And the mercury droplet means that the person who is in the image has impressive thoughts that sometimes drop to other people. The mercury droplet means that even if the person will try to hide the intelligent nature there are always dropping nice and beautiful ideas that have the price in gold. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Girl_with_a_Pearl_Earring

Men In Black

When we are thinking about the MIB or Men In Black we must realize that those men can work for the FBI or NSA. The fact is that those men are not probably people at all. There is a possibility that those strange creatures are some kind of remote-controlled robot. 

That is looking like humans. Those creatures are well-known for their connection with UFOs. The thing that made them "real" and made some people believe that those men have some kind of telepathic powers is that they are claimed to cause some kind of paranoia, problems with balance, and headaches. 

The list of those symptoms is taken from the book "The man who knew too much about UFOs. Those strange symptoms can be explained by the that those men or robots carry some kind of acoustic weapon. 

That weapon can use ultra- and infrasounds. And that thing can cause very powerful symptoms. 

Developers can hide the acoustic weapon inside the robot's body.  Or it can be in the gloves of the person. 

Powerful ultra-and infrasounds are effective weapons. They are not leaving a chemical trace. So the use of those weapons is easy to hide. 

The fact is, this. If those strange creatures are robots, they can be used as middlemen so that the researchers or investigators can hide their identity. So who are the MIB? And who controls them? This is a mystery. The fact is that many secrets are meant to be kept secret. There is the possibility that some people who are working with UFOs want to cover their identity. 

https://www.history.com/news/men-in-black-real-origins

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Men_in_black

Image: https://www.express.co.uk/news/weird/693386/Witness-claims-he-was-hounded-by-Men-in-Black-after-seeing-UFOs-fly-at-hyper-speed

Have you seen interesting detail in this portrait of the landscape?

There seems to be a bush where is the beginning or source of the river in that image. Then we look at that thing a little bit sharper. In our eyes, the bush is turning to the head of the bird. Or sharper saying the head of the finch. And the beginning of the river is in the mouth of that bird. So when we are looking and thinking about the purpose of this image. There is one message that the artist hide in the image. 

The message is that even the longest and largest rivers have the top point. There was something that made water follow the route. Even the largest rivers get their begin from the small stream. When the stream is making the deeper lane. 

That thing will collect water in that lane. But there was always the first water molecule that traveled through that route. Of course, the source of the flow is hidden from the eyes. But that source still exists. It might seem like some bush, but we see the very well-known shape of that thing. 

There is the final source for all water that flows in the river. When we think of the information as a river, there is always some person who has told the first story. So even the largest and most noisy rumors and agitation has the source. If some people will face trolling there is always the first troller. And when we are hiding those bad words in our heart and our mind. We might uncover the person the first cheater. 

When somebody tells the tales about the people, there is always something that makes other people follow that prime mover. The thing is that there is something that confesses to others that they get the benefit of following the leader. So why do the other people follow the cheater? What makes those people so popular? 

The Artist in his Studio (Rembrandt Van Rijn c.1628)

This painting portraits the probably young painter working in his studio. The remarkable detail in this painting is the face of the painter. The face seems covered with a mask. And if Rembrandt didn't make that painting in the 17th century, I would swear that the painter's face is covered by using plastic or some other synthetic material. The face of the painter is black, like two bites of carbon. And that will bring the demonic or mysterious aspect in that painting. 

Sometimes I have asked myself, that is it possible that the famous cartoonist Hérge has got the idea for the face of his famous cartoon character Tintin from the painter, who is acting as the model in this painting. Sometimes that character seemed a little bit scary like a "vampire". Because the skin is white and the eyes are weird. But otherwise, he seems kind. 

Or maybe the painter is not a demonic character. But he is very mystic. What does he think? And the major question, that rises in my head is, does that person know about observer? Or is Rembrandt made that portrait without the permission of the model? The faces of the painter are interesting because Rembrandt is usually accurate about finishing the faces. Why Rembrandt left faces without finishing?

The question is who is acting as a model for that painting? It's hard to estimate the age of the model because the face is somehow synthetic. But the small size and some other details are telling that the painter is quite young. Rembrandt might paint that person by using mirrors or camera obscura. And there is the possibility that the orderer of that painting has asked Rembrandt to hide the painter's identity.  

Cognito Ergo Sum II

        

.

Image I

Cognito Ergo Sum II

Cognito Ergo Sum "I think I am," said René Descartes, and the question is does the thinking mean that person or creature exists. So when we are thinking that only aware creatures can think we must realize that there is a question what makes this Descartes quote one of the most interesting topics in history. That question is that would the creature need the ability to think that it exists?

If we are thinking about things like stones they exist. We can test that thing by kicking the stone without a shoe, and that thing proves that thing exists. So does the ability to react to some kind of things like yelling by saying, "are you all right" mean that the creature understands the meaning of the words? The artificially intelligent robot can emulate feelings by looking at certain marks from the face of a human.

When the volume of the speech rises very high that robot can say "please low down your noise". Or if a person seems to be red or breathing badly that robot can go and offer help and use things like Heimlich Maneuver, but the thing is that certain parameters activate the action what the robot makes. Those actions are stored in the database, certain modules that include certain actions. But that doesn't mean that the robot understands what it does.

The fact is that if we are thinking of things like bugs, we must ask are those things real or are they alive. The answer is biologically bugs are alive creatures because they can make descendants and they can defend themselves. If some wasp would sting you, that thing means that the wasp exists, and that experience would be painful. But then we might think robot what would make copies of itself, and defend its operation area. The robot that makes copies of itself could call the "Von Neumann machines".

The fact is that if some car factory, what can make sub-robots that can find the raw materials independently and make copies of itself would also defend its area what makes it less living than some bug? The Von Neumann-machine can make powerful things like copies of itself, but it might not realize what it does. So does wasp understand what it does, when it puts its sting in the human skin? That thing is interesting. The very complicated Von Neumann-machines would be the things, what would revolutionize many things.

Quantum computers are causing the revolution in artificial intelligence. Quantum computers can run more complicated algorithms than we ever imagine. So even the computing capacity would put limits to the operations of artificial intelligence, we must realize that the quantum computers would make things, what computers ever make.

Image I: https://artanddesigninspiration.com/think-outside-the-box/

.

Image II

Can we turn our brains into the quantum computer?

Can we turn our brains into the quantum computer? Here I mean that could we put a person in a controlled dream, where the neural network of brains is operating as a quantum computer.

And that thing causes the discussions, what are the limits of artificial intelligence? Can we someday turn our brains into the quantum computer? In that case, the person would put in the condition, where the consciousness is connected off. Then the person would turn to the quantum computer, what operates by following the electric impulses, what are giving the impulses through the neural tracks.

In that case, the person would put in the "controlled dream", and then the brain would acting like the quantum computer. In some of the wildest ideas or jokes, the abductions are things, that are made, when the humanoids need more calculation capacity in their crafts. The fact is that the neural tracks neural systems that are connected to a computer can act as the quantum computer.

Image II: https://www.artstudio.org/surrealists-melded-reality-with-dreams-ito-create-imaginative-juxtapositions-of-imagery/

https://curiosityanddarkmatter.home.blog/2020/12/09/cognito-ergo-sum-ii/

It's the end of the rainbow

It's the end of the rainbow

Kimmo Huosionmaa

My dear readers, I have almost forgotten to write in these sites of the Blogger, and the reason is, that sometimes it's time to renew. I know that this might be feel or hear something, what I have written earlier. The blogger is a good platform and I would ever leave it. I have many feelings about this platform, and one is, that I published my first blog writing in here sometimes around ten years ago.

That writing was caused very positive feedback, and I started to write things first once in the month, but then more often. There are many people, who don't like this kind of texts, but then I must say, that I don't either like every persons or text, what I see, and maybe somebody is interested about this way of seeing the things. I have also right to dislike some person or texts.

First I was hiding my name for some reasons, what are only in my knowledge. But then I got more courage because of the positive feedback, what I got from my friends and other people. And I really believe that writings can change the world. The pen is the more powerful weapon than any gun, and this is the thing, what I learned from some book, what handled propaganda. The words are making motive to defend own ideology, and thoughts.

There have been happened many things after that, and the Blogger is not the only blog service in the world.  Here I mean, that sometimes it' very interesting to start with a new platform, as I have written many times before. And there is one thing, the new platform is not connected to one browser, so that is easier to handle. But don't worry I will sometimes continue to write also in here.

Of course, there is the possibility, that I will someday return to write texts here, but now "when inspiration strikes" the thing, what you might know is the primary area for my texts. But as you see, that there is the possibility, that I will someday return, and while waiting for that day, you might find my writings from the blogs, what are linked below the text. So see you there, and sometimes I will say, that may be in some day, I will start to write here again. And actually, if I would not update here something for a while, you might see my other blogs, what are linked to below the text.

There is one thing about publishing. Sometimes somebody doesn't like texts, what is written, and the thing is, that person who writes blogs cannot use only one service. There is always the possibility, that somebody would get angry about this kind of writings, and then the blog might face the censorship, what means that it can be denied, or getting to that work space might be make harder. And this is the thing, why sometimes must person change the platform, where the texts have been published.

https://wordpress.com/view/historiaajapolitiikkaa.wordpress.com

http://luonnonihmeitakaikillamausteilla.wordpress.com

https://jotkutasiatvainkiehtovatihmisia.wordpress.com

https://travellingintimeandspace.wordpress.com

https://wordpress.com/view/menneisyydenhaamut.home.blog

Two portraits of George Washington

Picture I

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Above the text is the portrait of George Washington, the first president of the United States of America. In this picture is a very interesting detail, and it is like the threat that this man would strike his hand to the quill, what is on the table. This detail is a very interesting thing in this painting, what is not, of course, the only one portrait, what is painted about this man, who was the first commander of the United States military forces. This painting was made by Gilbert Stuart in the year 1796, three years before the death of Washington  and the name of it is "Portrait of George Washington"

This man is a very interesting person, and when you read the background of Washington, you must notice that George Washington was not the most trustable selection for the leader of the independence fighters. This man was the only person, who survived in the ambush of the French troops in the seven years war, and then he was selected as the commanding officer. His background was English nobleman and in the stories, this man was the son of the priest, who drunk very much.

But the reason, why George Washington was elected were that he was suitable for this job is that he was old enough that he couldn't rule the country very long if he made the decision to stay in the position as the ruler of the nation. He was born in 1732 and died in 1799, at the age of 67, that means that he was quite an old man. And in some portraits, he was shown as the strong but at the same time frozen man, who was giving the hope and trust for men, and he takes those men in the command, and the picture is portraying the case when Washington and his army made camp in the Valley Forge. Here I must say, that I call the continental army as the "independence army".

Picture II

This portrait is a well-known item, what portraits the independence army traveling or marching in the forest, in the cold weather. There are many portraits of this very well known freedom fighter, and I took two of them in this text. At the above is the picture, where Washington stands in the side of the desk, and the quill is at the table. I sometimes think, why the painter has been portrayed him in this position? There are many things, what makes this painting very symbolic version of the way of using force in the United States of America.

The quill must symbolize the relationship between the president and the media. The reason, what made the independence fight successful, was that those leaders of the independence army were able to tell, the things what they represented to the great audience. That was the reason, why those people joined the independence movement, and the reason, why the army was standing in the line, was that the leaders were with them. Or this is the image, what is shown to the people. Actually, we cannot be sure, was Washington even with his men. If he was in somewhere at Alaska or Sibir, that would give a very effective tool in the hands of the Senate to keep this man in control.

This is of course only the philosophical period in this text, but the Senate must have something, what had the power against this man if he would not step away voluntary. And in theory, this can be one reason, why Washington elected to rule the United States after the independence war. We know, that this man was portrayed as a hero, but was the portrayer himself or somebody else. We can say, that those paintings, what are in the Finnish Wikipedia page about him are portraying any real situation, and this is the thing, what we must realize when we are looking at this man. He was the first president of the United States, and he had a very strong influence on the nation.And here I must say, that this man was very dangerous in the first years in the United States. He knew many secrets, what could cause death on both sides of the just independent states. So in that time, there were many people, who wanted to defame this man, who was the first man, who won the British army.

https://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Washington: Written in Finnish


Picture I

https://usercontent1.hubstatic.com/7745576_f496.jpg

Picture II

https://www.history.com/.image/t_share/MTU3ODc4Njg5NDE2OTQ3NDIz/hith-valley-forgemarchtovalleyforge1-2.jpg