Sunday, June 16, 2024

What is Alexandretta? (How the AI must act if it tries to find something)


Image above: The Damsel of the Sanct Grael
by Dante Gabriel Rossetti (1874) (Wikipedia, Holy Grail)


The image above portrays the lady. Lady keeps the Holy Gail in her hand. And there is a bird behind that lady. The bird carries some ball, and that causes an idea. That maybe the Holy Grail was two-part merchandise. The human has the cup, and then. Some unknown thing brings the activator. So, the Holy Grail requires two parts. The cup and the activator. And in stories, the Holy Grail is ineffective without that activator.  

And if we think freely, that activator can be the ball, there is forming a miniature black hole when the lightning hits that thing. Or maybe the electric shock drives DNA to the person who keeps the Holy Grail in their hands. The high-power electric shock that the electric eel makes can transfer genomes from one species to another. And that makes Holy Grail interesting. 

There is lots of fiction and almost fact about the Holy Grail. Somebody said that the Holy Grail was some mark that was used to mark important documents. Some others say that the Holy Grail is the gate to innovation and creativity. So the Holy Grail is some drink like absinth. In stories, the Holy Grail is the cup, that offers forever youth. So is it some energy pump, that can renew the person's DNA? Maybe it's only a story, but those stories are fascinating. 


This next part is based on a mixture of fact or almost fact-based and fictional sources, and it's an example of how AI should search for things like archeological merchandise. The theorem is this: there is a map and a reference to Alexandretta. 

If we talk about the Holy Grail we can think that the Alexandretta can be a city, it can be a woman. Or it can mean the bank office of Templars in Alexandretta. 

If AI wants to find the thing it must know all that this thing means. We can take the example of the data that the AI can use if it tries to find the Holy Grail. This example is from the fictive movie "Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade". 

The AI can follow the history line and say that "Alexandretta" is the city, that the Crusaders destroyed. And the place that is on that place is now Iskenderun. But if we continue this chain and talk about fictive maps, there are no names for the place, the AI can search what other things the Alexandretta can mean. 

The Alexandretta can be the woman's name. And maybe that woman is the person, who has those names. Without a map those names are ineffective. 

The Alexandretta can also be some other city, maybe the name of the hometown of the king's lover. Or maybe Alexandretta was some woman, who stored those missing names in her merchandise. The Alexandretta can also be the keyword for the box, where is the place of Holy Grail.  And maybe the Holy Grail meant some document. Or maybe not...

Or again maybe, Alxandretta was the bank office of Templars. That means the notes were stored in the bank in the Alexandreatta and then templars handled those papers. That bank office stored important papers of kings and noblemen. And it's possible. Those missing names were stored in the safebox, guarded by templars. Or Alexandretta can mean the Jerusalem or Akko branch of Templar's Bank of Alexandretta.

But as you know, this is an example from a fictional source. Indiana Jones is fiction, but the battle of Alexandretta was real. 


https://www.learnreligions.com/holy-grail-history-4783177


https://newatlas.com/biology/electric-eel-discharge-environmental-dna-transfer-electroporation/



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Alexandretta


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_Grail


Tuesday, April 9, 2024

Minimal space is an inspiring thing.










An empty, or minimal space is a thing that can form interesting ideas. That means empty rooms and a couple of merchandise can be a very inspiring thing. 






Thursday, August 11, 2022

Girl with a Pearl Earring.



This painting is created by Johannes Vermeer (1632-1675). The painting is also called "The Dutch Mona Lisa". The official tale about this painting goes like this. The model who sits in front of Vermeer was the maid of the Vermeer family. And the master himself fell in love with that girl, but his wife forced that maid to flee away because that kind of relationship is not acceptable. The story mentions that Vermeer gave that earring to that girl as a gift. And of course, that beautiful and sad story gave an innovation for the movie's plays. But the fact is that story is a myth. 

But the fact is that in the most modern theories that girl didn't even have that famous earring. When we are taking a closer look at the earring. We might see that is not even the pearl. It looks like a metal ball or maybe a droplet of mercury. And then we might look at the blue bandana that the girl wears. The blue color might mean that the thoughts of that girl are from heaven because the blue color means heaven. 



When we are looking at religious paintings. And one of them is pictured in Valamo Monastery in Finland (The Second image), we see a holy person wearing a blue toga. There is an interesting detail in that painting that was photographed in Valamo. In the place of the tree is the ghost-looking area there could be the figure that somebody tried to vanish. There could be larger Mary, the mother of Jesus creature. But that creature is wiped away for some unknown reason. The shape of that thing remains in that painting.

The blue color could mean that the person hides his identity. So the blue bandana could mean that the girl is very intelligent. And the mercury droplet means that the person who is in the image has impressive thoughts that sometimes drop to other people. The mercury droplet means that even if the person will try to hide the intelligent nature there are always dropping nice and beautiful ideas that have the price in gold. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Girl_with_a_Pearl_Earring

Saturday, July 16, 2022

Men In Black



When we are thinking about the MIB or Men In Black we must realize that those men can work for the FBI or NSA. The fact is that those men are not probably people at all. There is a possibility that those strange creatures are some kind of remote-controlled robot. 

That is looking like humans. Those creatures are well-known for their connection with UFOs. The thing that made them "real" and made some people believe that those men have some kind of telepathic powers is that they are claimed to cause some kind of paranoia, problems with balance, and headaches. 

The list of those symptoms is taken from the book "The man who knew too much about UFOs. Those strange symptoms can be explained by the that those men or robots carry some kind of acoustic weapon. 

That weapon can use ultra- and infrasounds. And that thing can cause very powerful symptoms. 

Developers can hide the acoustic weapon inside the robot's body.  Or it can be in the gloves of the person. 

Powerful ultra-and infrasounds are effective weapons. They are not leaving a chemical trace. So the use of those weapons is easy to hide. 

The fact is, this. If those strange creatures are robots, they can be used as middlemen so that the researchers or investigators can hide their identity. So who are the MIB? And who controls them? This is a mystery. The fact is that many secrets are meant to be kept secret. There is the possibility that some people who are working with UFOs want to cover their identity. 


https://www.history.com/news/men-in-black-real-origins


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Men_in_black


Image: https://www.express.co.uk/news/weird/693386/Witness-claims-he-was-hounded-by-Men-in-Black-after-seeing-UFOs-fly-at-hyper-speed



Wednesday, November 10, 2021

Have you seen interesting detail in this portrait of the landscape?



There seems to be a bush where is the beginning or source of the river in that image. Then we look at that thing a little bit sharper. In our eyes, the bush is turning to the head of the bird. Or sharper saying the head of the finch. And the beginning of the river is in the mouth of that bird. So when we are looking and thinking about the purpose of this image. There is one message that the artist hide in the image. 

The message is that even the longest and largest rivers have the top point. There was something that made water follow the route. Even the largest rivers get their begin from the small stream. When the stream is making the deeper lane. 

That thing will collect water in that lane. But there was always the first water molecule that traveled through that route. Of course, the source of the flow is hidden from the eyes. But that source still exists. It might seem like some bush, but we see the very well-known shape of that thing. 

There is the final source for all water that flows in the river. When we think of the information as a river, there is always some person who has told the first story. So even the largest and most noisy rumors and agitation has the source. If some people will face trolling there is always the first troller. And when we are hiding those bad words in our heart and our mind. We might uncover the person the first cheater. 

When somebody tells the tales about the people, there is always something that makes other people follow that prime mover. The thing is that there is something that confesses to others that they get the benefit of following the leader. So why do the other people follow the cheater? What makes those people so popular? 


Saturday, August 21, 2021

The Artist in his Studio (Rembrandt Van Rijn c.1628)





This painting portraits the probably young painter working in his studio. The remarkable detail in this painting is the face of the painter. The face seems covered with a mask. And if Rembrandt didn't make that painting in the 17th century, I would swear that the painter's face is covered by using plastic or some other synthetic material. The face of the painter is black, like two bites of carbon. And that will bring the demonic or mysterious aspect in that painting. 

Sometimes I have asked myself, that is it possible that the famous cartoonist Hérge has got the idea for the face of his famous cartoon character Tintin from the painter, who is acting as the model in this painting. Sometimes that character seemed a little bit scary like a "vampire". Because the skin is white and the eyes are weird. But otherwise, he seems kind. 

Or maybe the painter is not a demonic character. But he is very mystic. What does he think? And the major question, that rises in my head is, does that person know about observer? Or is Rembrandt made that portrait without the permission of the model? The faces of the painter are interesting because Rembrandt is usually accurate about finishing the faces. Why Rembrandt left faces without finishing?

The question is who is acting as a model for that painting? It's hard to estimate the age of the model because the face is somehow synthetic. But the small size and some other details are telling that the painter is quite young. Rembrandt might paint that person by using mirrors or camera obscura. And there is the possibility that the orderer of that painting has asked Rembrandt to hide the painter's identity.  


Wednesday, December 9, 2020

Cognito Ergo Sum II

        

.

Image I

Cognito Ergo Sum II

Cognito Ergo Sum "I think I am," said René Descartes, and the question is does the thinking mean that person or creature exists. So when we are thinking that only aware creatures can think we must realize that there is a question what makes this Descartes quote one of the most interesting topics in history. That question is that would the creature need the ability to think that it exists?

If we are thinking about things like stones they exist. We can test that thing by kicking the stone without a shoe, and that thing proves that thing exists. So does the ability to react to some kind of things like yelling by saying, "are you all right" mean that the creature understands the meaning of the words? The artificially intelligent robot can emulate feelings by looking at certain marks from the face of a human.

When the volume of the speech rises very high that robot can say "please low down your noise". Or if a person seems to be red or breathing badly that robot can go and offer help and use things like Heimlich Maneuver, but the thing is that certain parameters activate the action what the robot makes. Those actions are stored in the database, certain modules that include certain actions. But that doesn't mean that the robot understands what it does.

The fact is that if we are thinking of things like bugs, we must ask are those things real or are they alive. The answer is biologically bugs are alive creatures because they can make descendants and they can defend themselves. If some wasp would sting you, that thing means that the wasp exists, and that experience would be painful. But then we might think robot what would make copies of itself, and defend its operation area. The robot that makes copies of itself could call the "Von Neumann machines".

The fact is that if some car factory, what can make sub-robots that can find the raw materials independently and make copies of itself would also defend its area what makes it less living than some bug? The Von Neumann-machine can make powerful things like copies of itself, but it might not realize what it does. So does wasp understand what it does, when it puts its sting in the human skin? That thing is interesting. The very complicated Von Neumann-machines would be the things, what would revolutionize many things.

Quantum computers are causing the revolution in artificial intelligence. Quantum computers can run more complicated algorithms than we ever imagine. So even the computing capacity would put limits to the operations of artificial intelligence, we must realize that the quantum computers would make things, what computers ever make.

Image I: https://artanddesigninspiration.com/think-outside-the-box/

.

Image II

Can we turn our brains into the quantum computer?

Can we turn our brains into the quantum computer? Here I mean that could we put a person in a controlled dream, where the neural network of brains is operating as a quantum computer.

And that thing causes the discussions, what are the limits of artificial intelligence? Can we someday turn our brains into the quantum computer? In that case, the person would put in the condition, where the consciousness is connected off. Then the person would turn to the quantum computer, what operates by following the electric impulses, what are giving the impulses through the neural tracks.

In that case, the person would put in the "controlled dream", and then the brain would acting like the quantum computer. In some of the wildest ideas or jokes, the abductions are things, that are made, when the humanoids need more calculation capacity in their crafts. The fact is that the neural tracks neural systems that are connected to a computer can act as the quantum computer.

Image II: https://www.artstudio.org/surrealists-melded-reality-with-dreams-ito-create-imaginative-juxtapositions-of-imagery/

https://curiosityanddarkmatter.home.blog/2020/12/09/cognito-ergo-sum-ii/

Sunny day